@mastersthesis {248,
	title = {A revision of Nereidinae (Polychaeta, Nereididae)},
	year = {2004},
	type = {mastersphd},
	author = {Bakken, T.}
}
@article {247,
	title = {Redescription and resurrection of Typhlonereis gracilis Hansen, 1879 (Polychaeta, Nereididae)},
	journal = {Sarsia},
	volume = {88},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {346-352},
	author = {Bakken, T.}
}
@article {246,
	title = {A new species of Neanthes (Polychaeta: Nereididae) from southern Australia},
	journal = {Memoirs of Museum Victoria},
	volume = {59},
	number = {2},
	year = {2002},
	note = {Neanthes tasmani; Neanthes cf bassi},
	pages = {327-331},
	keywords = {POLYCHAETA NEREIDIDAE},
	author = {Bakken, T.}
}
@article {346,
	title = {Redescription of the Indo-Pacific polychaete Neanthes pachychaeta (Fauvel, 1918) n. comb. (Annelida, Phyllodocida, Nereididae) and its synonyms},
	journal = {Zoosystema},
	volume = {33},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {361-376},
	author = {Glasby, C. J. and Wilson, R. S. and Bakken, T.}
}
@article {251,
	title = {Overview of paragnaths in nereidid polychaetes (Polychaeta, Nereididae)},
	journal = {Zoosymposia},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2009},
	pages = {305{\textendash}316},
	abstract = {The form and arrangement of hardened paragnaths on the pharynx of polychaetes in the family Nereididae has for 150 years been used as a principal system of characters to distinguish species and other taxonomic ranks. Recent studies have shown that phylogenetic relationships based solely on paragnaths give different topologies and clade support than relationships inferred from other character systems. Furthermore, recent revisions and species descriptions continue to increase the range of known paragnath forms. We provide the first comprehensive overview of these important morphological characters, with the aim of encouraging more consistent observation and use of a standardized terminology in future studies. Illustrated descriptions and definitions of all known paragnath types are presented and compared. New terminology is introduced to improve description of paragnath types. Hypotheses are proposed for the chemical composition of pargnaths (scleroprotein), homology between different paragnaths types, and earlier studies implicitly proposing the homology of scleroprotein paragnaths with the more plesiomorphic pharyngeal soft papillae are addressed.},
	author = {Bakken, T. and Glasby, C. J. and Wilson, R. S.}
}
@article {249,
	title = {Redescription of two species of Neanthes (Polychaeta: Nereididae) possessing a large notopodial prechaetal lobe},
	journal = {Scientia Marina},
	volume = {70S3},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {27-33},
	abstract = {Phylogenetic analyses of {\textquotedblleft}nereidids with paragnaths{\textquotedblright} indicated that species currently assigned to Neanthes sensu lato possessing a notopodial prechaetal lobe as large as the notopodial dorsal and ventral ligules were grouped in a separate clade with uncertain relationships to nominal Neanthes taxa. Further studies of these species are required to test this theory. Literature studies and examination of material alike prove that redescriptions of several species are needed until phylogenetic analyses can be undertaken. To meet this goal material from two species is included here for redescription, being necessary to reveal as many details as possible for a forthcoming phylogenetic analysis. Neanthes bongcoi Pillai, 1965 was originally described from the Philippines and is redescribed based on a quantity of specimens. It is here reported to be common in northern Australian waters. Neanthes meggitti Monro, 1931 is redescribed based on type material and a lectotype is designated for N. meggitti. Both N. bongcoi and N. meggitti are characterised by presence of a notopodial lobe as large as dorsal and ventral notopodial ligules in anterior chaetigers. Relevance to similar characteristics in related species is discussed.},
	author = {Bakken, T.}
}
@article {252,
	title = {Phylogeny of nereidids (Polychaeta, Nereididae) with paragnaths},
	journal = {Zoologica Scripta},
	volume = {34},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {507-547},
	abstract = {A phylogenetic analysis was conducted of the Nereidinae {\textemdash} those members of the Nereididae (Polychaeta) with pharyngeal paragnaths. We had two objectives: to test the monophyly of currently accepted genera, subgenera and informal subgeneric groupings within the Nereidinae, and, if warranted, to propose a more natural classi.cation of the Nereidinae. Parsimony analyses were undertaken, including 52 terminal taxa from all genera and informal groupings from the large heterogeneous genera Nereis , Ceratonereis , Neanthes and Perinereis . Analyses of a character set of 52 informative characters yielded more than 10 000 equally parsimonious trees with a length of 176 steps (consistency index [CI] = 0.34, retention index [RI] = 0.66). Reweighting three times resulted in 445 most parsimonious trees with length 54.62 (CI = 0.59},
	keywords = {RW_CV},
	author = {Bakken, T. and Wilson, R. S.}
}
